Nuggets advance scout Chad Iske has the NBA at his fingertips.
With a few strokes on his laptop keyboard, Iske can:
• Find out exactly how many times a game Lakers guard Kobe Bryant posts up, and how effective Bryant is from that spot.
• See how often the Mavericks run a blindside pick to free up Dirk Nowitzki at the top of the key.
• Break down data to determine how successful Suns guard Steve Nash is when he drives left, whether he's more likely to shoot or pass in that situation, and whether he's more likely to go to the rim or pull up for a jumper.
But Iske doesn't simply get raw statistical data. He can also pair the data with video clips of every player and every play. And it's all available online within half an hour after each game ends.
The service is provided by Synergy Sports Technology. It is basketball scouting for the digital age, and 26 of the NBA's 30 teams use Synergy. The company even offers a way for a team's coaching staff to prepare a set of video clips that can be downloaded to an iPod and given to players.
Sports are becoming hi-tech. I've been a long time baseball fan, and it's simultaneously sad and exciting to see the game change over time.
In the MLB, we have seen the rise of specialists. There is no longer a binary division between hitters and pitchers; the categories are highly segmented. Pitching-wise, in addition to starters, a well-rounded bullpen staffs middle relievers, long relievers, setup guys and closers. Similarly, the batting line-up isn't solely comprised of eight full-time fielders. Bench and utility players exist in any line-up and are often swapped out depending on whether they hit well against the handedness of the opposing pitcher.
Technology has changed baseball from the bottom up. The Michael Lewis book, Moneyball (2003), discusses innovations by the 1998-2002 Oakland A's in detail. The book attributes the A's success to their redaction of traditional baseball norms that are essentially meaningless--like if a hot prospect has a "good" face for baseball--and they embrace statistical insight. Namely, the team treats individual plays like financial derivatives. They slice up the field with a multitude of gridlines and record the every play that is hit into an individual sector. Given the configuration of each specific player, such as the hitter, pitcher, teams playing, or the weather that day, they can analyze the winning plays in the game. They subsequently draft the players that add the most value to the configuration of their (even if the player in question is not a popular choice) and make coaching choices based around the micro-specific strengths of each player, thereby eliminating the guesswork. The book is a great read, and I highly recommend checking it out.
While sports fans will have to adjust to the changing style of professional sports, technology innovation permeates hobbyist and extreme sports. One that is particularly affected is paintball. The sport was borne in 1981 with a cattle-marking gun called the Nelspot 007. The marker (a less hostile name for "gun" that paintballers use) was slow-firing, clunky and innaccurate. Jams were frequent and expected. Fast-forward to today's markers and you have 20-30 balls per second of highly accurate, consistent shots. The result? The move from slow, strategic war-like gameplay to lightning-fast and hyperactive gameplay that resembles an american football match more so than a chess game.
I personally feel like something sacred is lost each time a record is broken or new rules are instituted for a changing game, in spite of my love for technology and innovation. What are your thoughts? In what other ways are sports affected?